top of page
211118_ECLLYC_INFOGRAFÍA_PWC_FONDO MÓVIL_Mesa de trabajo 1 copia.jpg

EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL

Boosting the European Green Deal in the crop production sector

The European Green Deal and European environmental and food strategies have established ambitious compliance objectives for which the agricultural sector and sustainable systems such as Conservation Agriculture will play an essential role.

 

Conservation Agriculture is a farming system that offers multiple environmental, economic and social benefits. It can contribute to attaining the objectives of the European Green Deal, the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies as well as the specific objectives set out by the European Commission for the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

A roadmap to make the EU economy sustainable and climate neutral by 2050. This includes a shift to a sustainable food system that can bring environmental, health and social benefits, as well as offer fairer economic gains.

THE NEW 2023-2027 CAP

The new common agricultural policy will be key to securing the future of agriculture and forestry by ensuring a sustainable future for European Farmers, providing more targeted support to smaller farms, and allowing greater flexibility for EU countries to adapt measures to local conditions. Agriculture and rural areas are central to the European Green Deal, and the new CAP will be a key tool in reaching the ambitions of the Farm to Fork and biodiversity strategies.

LARGE AGRICULTURE AND
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE IN DENMARK, FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, POLAND, AND SPAIN

CA is a sustainable agriculture production system comprising a set of farming practices adapted to the requirements of crops and local conditions of each region, whose farming and soil management techniques protect the soil from erosion and degradation, improve its quality and biodiversity, and contribute to the preservation of the natural resources, water and air, while optimizing yields

Principles on which CA is based

2.

Permanent vegetation coverage on the surface

3.

Rotation of crops and/or diversification of crops

1.

Not altering arable land through tilling actions

2add63_0d9a763037044c87bb41ee870377fa25~mv2.gif

Relevance of CA (six countries)

Group 27.png
Group 28.png
Group 23.png
Group 25.png
Group 26.png
Group 24.png

The benefits of CA

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S NEW 2023-2027 CAP

Group 10.png
Group 11.png

Contribution to more dynamic rural areas

Socio-economic contribution

CA-related farming activities bring direct and indirect economic benefits through time saving and thus reduction in labour requirement. Therefore, CA allows farmers to devote time to other economic and social activities on and off the farm

Group 12.png
Group 13.png
Elementos para wix-34.png
Elementos para wix-33.png
Elementos para wix-31.png
Elementos para wix-32.png
Elementos para wix-35.png

AIR

WATER

SOIL

BIODIVERSITY

FARMERS

Contributions to GDP

Contributions to employment

Group 33.png
Group 35.png
Group 35.png
Group 34.png

CA as an instrument to make rural areas more dynamic and to fight against rural abandonment

Agriculture and rural development

Group 46.png
Group 45.png
Group 47.png

Essential tools for CA practices

No-till seeders

No-till seeders are essential to prevent soil organic carbon losses that arise from tillage.

Integrated Weed Management

The integrated weed management (IWM) practice in CA optimizes the use of plant protection methods and products, including herbicides 

The role of the herbicide Glyphosate

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides due to its appropriate characteristics: effective one-pass weed control on a broad spectrum of weeds and cover-crops, environmental profile, non- selectivity, cost-effectiveness, etc

of the current crop production can be associated with the use of glyphosate

of EU farmers believe that there is no cost-efficient alternative to glyphosate

of farmers would abandon no-tillage soil management systems (CA) if it were not for glyphosate

€2,680m

35%

38%

The risks of not having access to herbicides (such as glyphosate)

It should be specified that the elimination of glyphosate would cause varying increased costs for the farmer depending on the dose applied, the active substance used and the type of weeds targeted.

COST INCREASE

MACROECONOMIC ESTIMATED CONTRIBUTION OF THE USE OF GLYPHOSATE IN DENMARK, FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, POLAND, AND SPAIN (2021) - GDP

2add63_9e7fc64c1111404e90784723ade1953b_mv2.png
2add63_6e102284c2684976a1e611585a5acf81_mv2.png
2add63_73dae97be2f74cadb682af93841e17cd_mv2.png
2add63_9e7fc64c1111404e90784723ade1953b_mv2.png
2add63_6e102284c2684976a1e611585a5acf81_mv2.png
2add63_73dae97be2f74cadb682af93841e17cd_mv2.png
Elementos para wix-55.png
Group 53.png
Elementos para wix-56.png
Group 54.png

Economic
sustainability

Environmental sustainability

Social
sustainability

ECONOMIC

ENVIRONMENTAL

SOCIAL

Environmental

Socio-economic

45%

Higher costs with the use of chemical alternatives to glyphosate in CA

€2,680 M

Decrease in crop output without the use of glyphosate

1,328m

direct contribution

1,469m

spillover effects

2,799m

total contribution

Group 10.png
Elementos para wix-56.png
Group 28.png

Conservation Agriculture and the tools for its implementation in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain

Group 538.png
Group 539.png

Herbicides in IWM

CA principles lead to the application of optimised amounts of herbicides whilst minimizing the risk of downstream contamination.

The essential tools needed to implement CA include no-till seeders and IWM with optimized herbicide use

bottom of page