top of page
211118_ECLLYC_INFOGRAFÍA_PWC_FONDO MÓVIL_Mesa de trabajo 1 copia.jpg

Boosting the European Green Deal in the crop production sector

Conservation Agriculture (CA) is a sustainable agriculture production system comprising a set of farming practices adapted to the requirements of crops and local conditions of each region, whose farming and soil management techniques protect the soil from erosion and degradation, improve its quality and biodiversity, and contribute to the preservation of the natural resources, water and air, while optimizing yields

Principles on which CA is based

2.

Permanent vegetation coverage on the surface

3.

Rotation of crops and/or diversification of crops

1.

Not altering arable land through tilling actions

2add63_0d9a763037044c87bb41ee870377fa25~mv2.gif

Relevance of CA in Poland

Group 199.png
Group 179.png
Group 213.png
Group 205.png
Group 201.png

The benefits of CA

Contribution to more dynamic rural areas

Socio-economic contribution

CA-related farming activities bring direct and indirect economic benefits through time saving and thus reduction in labour requirement. Therefore, CA allows farmers to devote time to other economic and social activities on and off the farm.

Elementos para wix-34.png
Elementos para wix-33.png
Elementos para wix-31.png
Elementos para wix-32.png
Elementos para wix-35.png

AIR

WATER

SOIL

BIODIVERSITY

AGRICULTURE

Contributions to GDP

Contributions to employment

Group 181.png
Group 185.png
Group 187.png
Group 183.png

CA as an instrument to make rural areas more dynamic and to fight against rural abandonment

Agriculture and rural development

Group 223.png
Group 219.png
Group 221.png

Essential tools for CA practices

No-till seeders

No-till seeders are essential to prevent soil organic carbon losses that arise from tillage.

Herbicides

The integrated weed management (IWM) practice in CA optimizes the use of plant protection methods and products, including herbicides.

The role of the herbicide Glyphosate

Glyphosate, which is essential to CA practices, contributes to more effective and efficient weed control than other alternatives and its use is associated with higher productivity and lower costs

2add63_9e7fc64c1111404e90784723ade1953b_mv2.png
2add63_6e102284c2684976a1e611585a5acf81_mv2.png
2add63_73dae97be2f74cadb682af93841e17cd_mv2.png
Elementos para wix-55.png
Group 53.png
Elementos para wix-56.png
Group 54.png

Economic

Environmental

Social

Environmental

Socio-economic

€ 18 M

Of current crop production can be associated with the use of glyphosate

35%

of EU farmers believe that there is no cost-efficient alternative to glyphosate

38%

of farmers in the EU would abandon CA techniques if it were not for glyphosate

The risks of not having access to Glyphosate

It should be specified that the elimination of glyphosate will cause varying increased costs for the farmer depending on the dose applied, the active substance used and the type of weeds targeted.

Cost increase 

15%

Decrease in crop output without the use of glyphosate

€112 M

Yield decrease in fruit orchards without the use of glyphosate

MACROECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF GLYPHOSATE USE IN FRANCE (2021) - GDP

36m €

direct contribution

72m €

spillover effects (associated sectors and households)

108m €

total contribution

Conservation Agriculture and the tools for its implementation in Poland

Group 538.png
Elementos para wix-56.png
Group 119.png
bottom of page